Every time I read John Dewey, I become so much more optimistic. He sees so much value in the things people do, the ways they interact with their environment to grow and learn. Dewey begins by describing how experience begins with an “impulsion,” which is “the movement of the organism in its entirety” towards some outward interest (58). That true experience is something that begins with the self moving outward, towards some destination in making sense of the world. Dewey says a “complete experience” is “an activity that calls the whole self into play” (58). This way of looking at things, to me, feels positive because it gives power to the individual. To Dewey, the individual takes information and obstacles from the environment and refines their understanding, so when you read John Dewey as a teacher, you just feel good about learning! It’s like, “don’t worry about tests, the kids should be having meaningful experiences and grappling with complex questions because that’s where learning really happens.” John Dewey wrote this in 1935! Why aren’t we doing this in schools?
I also think the optimism that Dewey inspires could be used to look positively on the ways an artist’s engagement is what matters, not necessarily the media the artist uses. Yes, we could argue that much of our new technology doesn’t really give us the “complete experiences” described by Dewey, and in fact, it often takes our attention away from complete experiences. But there’s another side to it too. Artistic expression, as described by John Dewey is the result of a kind of a potion recipe brewing inside the cauldron of your soul (corny, I know). It is the way old knowledge bubbles up as “coefficients in new adventures” alongside the things in the environment that help and hinder your impulsion, your purpose (61). So expression is the coming together of the new elements in your environment, your prior knowledge, and the thing you want to do. Creating a piece of art is solving a problem or answering a question that you have. Dewey says, “…acts once performed spontaneously in separation are assembled and converted from raw, crude material into works of expressive art. Only where material is employed as media is there expression and art” (63). In this sense, the process of creating art is important because the work takes form through the artist’s interaction with the materials, their knowledge, and their environment. The materials we have in our environment are different from the ones in 1935, but the fact of the matter is that we are still trying to make meaning for through the experiences we have. For me, this means everyone is capable of artistic expression, because everyone has the potential to have complete experiences in their lives. That’s why giving kids amazing experiences while learning should be the number one priority, because then we can give kids the tools they need for true expression.
Herbert Brun speaks about composing a piece of music, and it reminds me of Dewey, in that he describes creating as a methodological process, similar to creating a potion in the lab. There are ingredients and tools. There are the things you know about your craft and you use that knowledge to create new things for people to hear, see, ect. “The contemporary relevance and significance of a composition should be achieved in that it does not appeal to existing means of understanding music but rather creates new means for musical understanding.” Like Dewey, Brun highlights the importance of the ways in which an artist interacts with their materials to make something. When he describes the ways in which a composer must understand the systems and elements of different musical instruments, he is describing how composers play with possibilities in a very logical and mathematical way. To Brun and Dewey, artistic expression is taking what you know and rearranging it into new relationships to create something else.
When I think of Dewey, I see this potential in everyone, but Brun makes me think about how much raw material, how much prior knowledge, you need to create something like a piece of music. Brun says, “If I am faced with a certain state of affairs, be it in music, language, politics or family, I will, for the purpose of understanding and evaluating, not only need to know the precise present constellation of all the elements, but also the number of possible states out of which this particular one which faces me had been selected.” Basically, he’s saying you need to study and know your stuff before you can do anything. With Brun, I still think everyone has that potential, but we don’t all get to that point.